2009 and 2008 assessments. Generalized description of macroinvertebrate communities associated with health tiers. These are not criteria, but rather descriptions based on averages calculated from many samples. Characteristics of individual samples can vary.
| Very good | Nearly natural or natural conditions. The community is diverse. Many types of organisms are present. The majority of the population is intolerant of human-caused stresses. Meets Virginia aquatic life standard. |
| Good | Slightly degraded. The community is diverse. Many types of organisms are present, but the number of types of sensitive organisms is somewhat reduced relative to the “very good” community. The majority of the population is intolerant of human-caused stresses. Probaly meets Virginia aquatic life standard. |
| Fair | Moderately degraded. The community is fairly diverse. Many types of organisms are present, but the number of types of sensitive organisms is reduced relative to the “very good” community. The majority of the population is tolerant of human-caused stresses. Probably does not meet Virginia’s aquatic life standard. |
| Poor | Substantially degraded. The community is clearly less diverse than “very good” communities. Fewer types of organisms are present, and the number of types of sensitive organisms is deeply reduced. The great majority of the population is tolerant of human-caused stresses. Does not meet Virginia’s aquatic life standard. |
| Very poor | Severely degraded. The community contains very few types of organisms, virtually all of which are tolerant of human-caused stresses. Does not meet Virginia’s aquatic life standard. |